Hi Mark,
Thanks. I agree we should stick with 'at home', especially if a lot of
controllers don't have the 'homed' concept.
With regards to the controllers that do have that concept, should the
drivers use ATHM to mean 'at home'? The PMAC driver currently doesn't,
but the XPS driver does. Do you think we should bring the XPS driver in
line with the PMAC driver? (or vice versa?)
>From the users point of view it's slightly confusing. At Diamond they
are used to seeing motors in a homed state, regardless of position. Our
XPS motors always tend to look 'un-homed', because they've been driven
away from home position.
> I don't think you can infer "at home" from the position.
> What if the motor is a stepper with no encoder and it lost
> steps sometime after being homed? It might not really be at
> home when the position says it is.
>
Good point, I forgot about that one.
Cheers,
Matthew
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pearson, MR (Matthew) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:37 AM
> To: Mark Rivers; Ron Sluiter; Joe Sullivan; Tim Mooney; Pete R. Jemian
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Motor home status
>
>
> Hi,
>
> At Diamond we're currently using several motor controllers, including
> the OMS (58 and MAXv), the Delta Tau PMAC (PMAC2-VME,
> Geobrick) and the
> Newport XPS.
>
> The motor record has a field called ATHM, which is set to 1 when the
> motor has hit a home switch.
>
> The OMS and Newport drivers use this field correctly, in that ATHM is
> set to 1 when the motor is at home position (and is 0 otherwise).
> However, the PMAC driver retains the ATHM status when moving away from
> the home position - it actually means 'homed' for this driver, rather
> than 'at home'.
>
> Most of the motor control at Diamond is performed using the
> PMAC driver,
> so everyone here has become used to this convention. It is
> arguably more
> useful to have a 'homed' status, rather than 'at home'.
> Especially since
> the 'at home' status can be inferred from the position (once
> it is homed
> of course).
>
> Is it the case that every other driver apart from the PMAC
> driver obeys
> the ATHM status? I was considering changing the XPS driver to bring it
> in line with the PMAC driver (for the benefit of our beamline users
> mainly). However, if every other motor controller driver out
> there obeys
> ATHM, then changing another one to do something different
> probably isn't
> ideal. In this case, we'll probably just leave it as it is.
>
> Any thoughts on this? Or info on other motor controller drivers?
>
> Regards,
> Matthew
>
> Dr Matthew Pearson
> Software Systems Engineer
> Diamond Light Source Ltd
> Diamond House
> Chilton, Didcot
> OX11 0DE
> Tel: +44 (0)1235 778538
> (58
> <DIV><FONT size="1" color="gray">This e-mail and any attachments may
> contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material,
> and are for
> the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended
> addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us
> of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain,
> distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual
> and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept
> liability for any
> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may
> be transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in
> England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell
> Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United
> Kingdom
> </FONT></DIV>
>
<DIV><FONT size="1" color="gray">This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
</FONT></DIV>
- Replies:
- RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- References:
- Motor home status Pearson, MR (Matthew)
- RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- Next:
RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- Next:
RE: Motor home status Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|