On Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008, Till Straumann wrote:
> Unless I miss something then it seems to me
> that EPICS uses 'assert()' in the same way I often
> do which AFAIK is incorrect:
>
> assert( expression_with_side_effect );
>
> because if the code is ever compiled with -DNDEBUG then
> the side effect (eg locking a mutex in epicsMutexMustLock())
> *goes*away*.
>
> 'assert' is a macro which evaluates to nothing if NDEBUG is defined.
>
> The correct way of using assert would be:
>
> result = expression_with_side_effect;
>
> assert(result);
>
> but it is inconvenient because the message printed by a failed
> assertion would only say 'assertion of 'result' failed' and it would
> not print the stringified expression.
My standard solution is to use a variable name that sufficiently describes
the asserted invariant. For instance
#define epicsMutexMustLock(ID) {\
epicsMutexLockResultIsOk_ ## ID =\
(epicsMutexLock((ID))==epicsMutexLockOK);\
assert(epicsMutexLockResultIsOk_ ## ID); }
Cheers
Ben
- References:
- assert caveat Till Straumann
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
LvEPICS on USB Key pre-release Mauro Giacchini
- Next:
Building CAP5 under windows or cygwin David Morris
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
assert caveat Till Straumann
- Next:
Re: assert caveat Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|