Hi Carl,
Carl Lionberger wrote:
> Hi Hinko,
>
> I agree that MALM should be 16 in this case. My question is what client
> you are using to show the values you are dissatisfied with. It seems to
> me that it is mishandling the metadata for the subarray record, or
> perhaps the metadata from the subarray is not appropriate. Perhaps it
> is reading NORD, which would be appropriate for a waveform, but not a
> subarray record.
>
I'm testing the outputs with the camonitor utility supplied with the
EPICS base.
Regards,
Hinko
--
Hinko Kocevar
Technical support engineer
Instrumentation Technologies
Velika pot 22, SI-5250 Solkan - Slovenia
T:+386 5 3352600, F:+386 5 3352601
mailto: [email protected]
http://www.i-tech.si - When your users demand stability
- Replies:
- Re: subArray processing Carl Lionberger
- References:
- subArray processing Hinko Kocevar
- Re: subArray processing Carl Lionberger
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: LabView shared memory interface Jack
- Next:
Re: subArray processing Hinko Kocevar
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: subArray processing Carl Lionberger
- Next:
Re: subArray processing Carl Lionberger
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|