EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: compact PCI versus VME
From: Matthias Clausen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:46:17 +0100
All our new IOCs are running in Compact PCI

CPU:
-------
We have tested several CPUs and many of them failed running the redundancy communication on the second Ethernet.
We have now selected one CPU which is running very stable:
For high CPU load - but with active cooling:
Application: Redundant cryo IOC >= 2000 records
Kontron type CP307


We will test next week:
For medium CPU load without active (fan) cooling:
Application: Small redundant IOSs; communication with PLCs on the second Ethernet; any other EPICS IOC
Kontron type CP305 (Atom processor)


Both CPUs with latest vxWorks BSP.
Both CPUs come with several different options - like rear I/O etc.
The advantage of the CP305 is that not only the power consumption is low - also the price is attractive.
For now we are only running a (up to four) Profibus boards from Softing in the crates - with full redundancy support on the Profibus (special firmware from Softing). - No direct I/O



Crates:
---------
We have a set of new creates designed by DESY - implemented by ELMA in Germany


DIN-Rail: (IOC in the field - can be mounted on DIN-rail)
Dual power supply four slot cPCI

19" (redundant IOC)
2X dual power and four cPCI

19" (multi slot)
1X dual power eight slot cPCI


If you need more details - contact us



Cheers Matthias

References:
RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
RE: compact PCI versus VME Dalesio, Leo

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: compact PCI versus VME Korhonen Timo
Next: RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: compact PCI versus VME Korhonen Timo
Next: RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·