EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: compact PCI versus VME
From: Korhonen Timo <[email protected]>
To: "Lawrence T. Hoff" <[email protected]>
Cc: "'Eric Bjorklund'" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:41:00 +0100
Lawrence T. Hoff wrote:
----------what fpga are you using for this? We looked at putting a power PC
core onto the FPGA, then we found out that this would not be supported on
their next generation FPGA.


We use the Xilinx with the PPC440 core.
This is the second generation for Xilinx (previously PPC405 core).
I have heard the same rumors - the next generation is likely
to be ARM-based, not PPC-based.

This is more than a rumor - this article has more details:
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6702617.html?nid=3351&rid=9447059

For "serious" processing the embedded CPUs and microblaze are
pretty weak, even though you can run an IOC there (for connectivity).
In general, we try (or at least should try) to minimize the dependency on the EDK
(embedded development kit) structures in our FPGA designs. Xilinx
tends to change the internal architecture pretty often.


In theory, that will be functionally equivalent (but require a
new tool chain).

In theory yes, but probably the internal bus structure etc. will once again
change. Ensuring portability of designs between Xilinx toolset versions is not
their strongest point....


The long-term maintenance will then be the problem. You either invest a lot to port
all the FPGA designs to recent platforms (as far as it goes - sometimes it does not)
or have to maintain several versions of the tools ready to be used.


Timo


--
Timo Korhonen PSI (Paul Scherrer Institut, http://www.psi.ch) CH-5232 Villigen PSI tel + 41- 56 3103262 fax + 41 - 56 310 5090 e-mail: [email protected]



References:
RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
RE: compact PCI versus VME Dalesio, Leo
RE: compact PCI versus VME Lawrence T. Hoff

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: compact PCI versus VME Lawrence T. Hoff
Next: Re: compact PCI versus VME Matthias Clausen
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: compact PCI versus VME Lawrence T. Hoff
Next: Re: compact PCI versus VME Matthias Clausen
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  <20102011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·