Title: RE: compact PCI versus VME
Ø We're using
XC5VSX95T-1FF1136I (Virtex 5SX family with 1136 BGA package). The large DSP block (640 DSP48 blocks, mainly for high speed BPM filter) is main reason for the decision. It is pin to pin compatible with Virtex5 FX70 chip (which was used on the 507 demo board, it has 128 DSP48 blocks
Ø And have implemented a standard interface between the analog and digital portions. This allows us to customize the IO portion. We are embedded an event receiver into the digital portion of the board.
- References:
- RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
- RE: compact PCI versus VME Dalesio, Leo
- RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: dbLoadTemplate issue in 3.14.9-11 Ralph Lange
- Next:
edm : TwoDProfileMonitorClass : cropping/resizing image Kate Feng
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: compact PCI versus VME Jeff Hill
- Next:
dbLoadTemplate issue in 3.14.9-11 Emmanuel Mayssat
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|