Re: Please do not hijack threads [was: cPCI]

["leige" <leige@ihep.ac.cn>]

Hi, All,

I apologize for this trouble. I did post the cPCI mail by replying a mail of "time stamp question", although I modified the topic. I use outlook express. And finally I noticed how strange it looks in http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2010/threads.php?expd=01293&page=16#16

Sorry for this chaos. 

Ge
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Lange" <Ralph.Lange@bessy.de>
To: "Maren Purves" <m.purves@jach.hawaii.edu>
Cc: <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: Please do not hijack threads [was: cPCI]


>  On 07.09.2010 15:46, Maren Purves wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote:
>>
>>> Tech-Talk messages are keeping the original sender in the "From:" 
>>> header intact, so a simple "reply" should create a mail to the 
>>> original sender.
>>> The "tech-talk-bounces" address is added in the "Sender:" and - more 
>>> importantly - "Errors-To:" headers to direct mail bounces to 
>>> mailman's automated bounce-handling mechanism.
>>> This fully complies to the relevant RFCs and works without any 
>>> problem on most mail clients and with ten-thousands of lists that are 
>>> handled by mailman world-wide.
>>>
>>> What mail client are you using that shows this erroneous behavior?
>>
>> If it's supposed to work like that it probably does.
>> I use pine when I'm at home, seamonkey when I'm at work.
> 
> Those should be fine.
> I know that Outlook does a bunch of non-compliant weird things wrt 
> replying to mails, so I was fearing the worst....
> 
> Happy mailing!
> ~Ralph
>