On Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> As I write this we have just exceeded 2000 votes on 49 ideas, from a
> total of 134 user sessions. I approved several new suggestions from
> the community earlier this morning and in total you have submitted 23
> additions to my original ideas, so please keep voting, the new ideas
> need to be prioritized too.
>
> If you get given some really weird choices, don't forget that the "I
> can't decide" button allows you to skip making some decisions.
Some random comments.
I see: "track which client last updated a PV" but this is already
supported by CaPutLog.
"Keep the existing simple .db file syntax": I'd like to say: yes, in
principle, but I am not opposed to (would in fact appreciate) well
thought-out extensions. So, do I say yes or no?
I think it would make sense to allow user comments on the site. Also, it
would be nice if there were links to a more detailed description for
each proposal. As stated some are not clear enough. What does "make
permanent changes online in record fields through clients" mean?
Cheers
Ben
- Replies:
- Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Ben Franksen
- References:
- EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Andrew Johnson
- Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Andrew Johnson
- Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: monitors received out of order Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Ben Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: EPICS Suggestions and Priorities Ben Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|