Last chance to save the sequencer's pv layer

[Ben Franksen <ben.franksen@online.de>]

On Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, Ben Franksen wrote:
> this is a poll to determine whether anyone is actually using the
> sequencer with backends other than Channel Access and so needs
> support for the pv layer between the sequencer and the backend data
> transfer protocol.
>
> I would rather like to get rid of the pv layer for several reasons.

The people at KECK have told me they discussed it and have decided they 
no longer need the KTL support, quote: "We're all for simplifying it!"

So, one last time:

If you are using the pv layer for anything (other than as obligatory 
bridge to CA as required by previous sequencer versions), or if you 
think that there are other important reasons to keep it, this is your 
last chance to save it, otherwise it's going to pay its debt to nature.

Cheers
Ben
-- 
"Never confuse what is natural with what is habitual."
                                   -- attributed to Mahatma Gandhi