Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
|
I would like to replace a few of my existing CALC records (polynomial transformation) with simple breakpoint tables. Let's assume that my raw values are voltages between 0 and 5V, I could therefore build a transformation table as follow:
breaktable(bptPosSlope) { raw=0.000000 slope=9.000000e+00 eng=-27.000000 raw=1.000000 slope=1.800000e+01 eng=-18.000000 raw=2.000000 slope=1.800000e+01 eng=0.000000 raw=3.000000 slope=1.400000e+01 eng=18.000000 raw=4.000000 slope=3.000000e+00 eng=32.000000 raw=5.000000 slope=3.000000e+00 eng=35.000000 }
Although the table allows for double/float transformation, to my surprise, the RAW value stored in the AI record is an integer. Maybe is it because of my INP link...
This record is supposed to be the raw value clsXdev:6175>dbpr RECORDS:BrkpntTable:Rdbck:RawAI ASG: DESC: Raw readback DISA: 0 DISP: 0 DISV: 1 NAME: RECORDS:BrkpntTable:Rdbck:RawAI RVAL: 0 SEVR: NO_ALARM STAT: NO_ALARM SVAL: 0 TPRO: 0 VAL: 1.111
Which is transformed in another ai record (which has its INP field pointing to the above record).
clsXdev:6175>dbpr RECORDS:BrkpntTable:RdbckAI 3 ACKS: NO_ALARM ACKT: YES ADEL: 0 ALST: -18 AOFF: 0 ASG: ASLO: 1 BKPT: 00 DESC: Readback DISA: 0 DISP: 0 DISS: NO_ALARM DISV: 1 DTYP: Raw Soft Channel EGU: mm EGUF: 0 EGUL: 0 EOFF: 0 ESLO: 1 EVNT: 0 FLNK:CONSTANT 0 HHSV: NO_ALARM HIGH: 0 HIHI: 0 HOPR: 0 HSV: NO_ALARM HYST: 0 INIT: 0 INP:DB_LINK RECORDS:BrkpntTable:Rdbck:RawAI.VAL NPP NMS LALM: -18 LBRK: 0 LCNT: 0 LINR: bptPosSlope LLSV: NO_ALARM LOLO: 0 LOPR: 0 LOW: 0 LSV: NO_ALARM MDEL: 0 MLST: -18 NAME: RECORDS:BrkpntTable:RdbckAI NSEV: NO_ALARM NSTA: NO_ALARM ORAW: 1 PACT: 0 PHAS: 0 PINI: NO PREC: 3 PRIO: LOW PROC: 0 PUTF: 0 ROFF: 0 RPRO: 0 RVAL: 1 SCAN: 1 second SDIS:CONSTANT SEVR: NO_ALARM SIML:CONSTANT SIMM: NO SIMS: NO_ALARM SIOL:CONSTANT SMOO: 0 STAT: NO_ALARM SVAL: 0 TIME: 2013-11-22 16:44:26.374133281 TPRO: 0 TSE: 0 TSEL:CONSTANT UDF: 0 VAL: -18
Now for some reason the RVAL of this last record is = to 1 (and not 1.1111) As a result, the VAL is not calculated correctly.
Is RVAL supposed to be an integer? How can fix my current example?
Thanks, -- Emmanuel
|
- Replies:
- RE: Breakpoint tables: Raw value must be integer?!? Allison, Stephanie
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Why should I care about breakpoint table monotonicity? Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: Breakpoint tables: Raw value must be integer?!? Allison, Stephanie
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EpicsSharp issues Alain Bertrand
- Next:
RE: Breakpoint tables: Raw value must be integer?!? Allison, Stephanie
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
|
|
ANJ, 20 Apr 2015 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Talk
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|