On 08/10, Ralph Lange wrote:
> All releases having a 0 as third part of the release number
> (e.g. 3.15.0, 3.16.0.1) are explicitly deemed "not for production
> use". For all others, production use is at your own risk.
I didn't know that. Thanks!
Lewis
- References:
- [no subject] Paramveer Jain
- Re: Pete Jemian
- Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? J. Lewis Muir
- Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Michael Davidsaver
- Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EGU field length vs. Channel Access protocol bob dalesio
- Next:
Re: EGU field length vs. Channel Access protocol Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? J. Lewis Muir
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|