On 01/29, Miroslav Pavleski wrote:
> My colleague Matej Sekoranja has the answer:
>
> JCA interfaces are (a bit) outdated. If you are looking for a modern
> CA Java interface check this out:
>
> https://github.com/channelaccess/ca
Hi, Miroslav.
Is ca the successor to JCAE:
https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/jcae
Both are developed at PSI, no?
Are both used in production? Are both supported? What does the future
of JCAE look like?
One thing I note is that it appears that JCAE has a client *and* a
server implementation, while ca has just a client. Is that right?
Are there plans to add a server implementation to ca?
Would JCAE still be a sound choice for a new project that needed a
client *and* a server implementation, or even a sound choice for a
project that needed just a server implementation? Or would it be better
to avoid it because it's being phased out, instead going with ca for the
client and CAJ (even though dated) for the server?
Thanks!
Lewis
- References:
- Java API JCA / CAJ DBR_LONG Ryan Slominski
- Re: Java API JCA / CAJ DBR_LONG Miroslav Pavleski
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Java API JCA / CAJ DBR_LONG Miroslav Pavleski
- Next:
CAJ and JCA links on website point to SourceForge J. Lewis Muir
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Java API JCA / CAJ DBR_LONG Miroslav Pavleski
- Next:
Re: Java API JCA / CAJ DBR_LONG matej . sekoranja
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|