Re: Radiation Monitors

[Heinz Junkes <junkes@fhi-berlin.mpg.de>]

Dear Andrew,

we run the FHT620, using asyn.

FHT db and proto can be found here: http://hg.rz-berlin.mpg.de/FHIFEL_IOCs/IOCDOSE/file/f4ddf0ee30a9/db

We are using a exhaust system from Berthold. Also with asyn.
Files to the berthold can be found here: http://hg.rz-berlin.mpg.de/FHIFEL_IOCs/IOCBACNET-GW/file/9c59da0fbf22/sys/berthold

Works since more then 5 Years without much excitement.

Heinz


> On 20. Apr 2018, at 06:37, Andrew C. Starritt <Andrew.Starritt@synchrotron.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Dear tech-talkers,
>  
> At the Australian Synchrotron, we have started an initiative to upgrade our radiation monitors.
> We are currently investigating Thermo Scientific FHT 6020, Ludlum 375 and Berthold models.
>  
> We would in interested in hearing about your experience with radiation monitor in general and
> the above models in particular, especially with respect to integrating these into EPICS.
>  
> Regards 
>  
>  
> Andrew C. Starritt | Leader Accelerator and Support Systems | Australian Synchrotron 
> p: (03) 8540 4164 | f: (03) 8540 4200
> andrew.starritt@synchrotron.org.au | www.synchrotron.org.au
> 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature