|
Subject: |
dbGetPdbAddrFromLink dropped from 3.15 again |
|
From: |
Till Straumann <[email protected]> |
|
To: |
EPICS Techtalk <[email protected]> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:56 -0700 |
I'm running into the same issue that was discussed here:
https://epics.anl.gov/tech-talk/2017/msg01247.php
Michael's answer (https://epics.anl.gov/tech-talk/2017/msg01268.php)
recommends replacing subRecord by aSubRecord -- however, my use case
rather fits the first scenario mentioned by Michael: avoiding the
overhead of dbGet()
What is the recommended migration path for this case?
I guess I could use
dbGetNelements(const struct link*)
dbGetLinkDBFtype(const struct link*)
to make sure the target of my link matches the expectations -- but there is
no way to access the data the link points to without either making a copy
(dbGet) or exploiting internals (which is deprecated/discouraged)
:-(
Like other posters I'm looking for a minimally intrusive (and yet
'safe') solution
for a legacy system with not much horse-power.
- Till
- Replies:
- Re: dbGetPdbAddrFromLink dropped from 3.15 again Michael Davidsaver
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: IOC Crash with No Exception Generated Ricardo Cardenes via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: a question for msi Bruce Hill
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Compiler error on Debian Stretch arm Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: dbGetPdbAddrFromLink dropped from 3.15 again Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·