Can you post the entire solution with the other sseq records? This is actually a rather burning demand for a lot of people who have worries about collisions or are dealing with a mix of very fast and very slow motors.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 11:03 AM
To: David Vine <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis
Hi David,
I do similar things using the sseq record, and calcout records to do checks that everything got to where it should do before progressing the sseq.
If you set WAITN to be ‘Wait’ for each sseq output, and use a CA link, it will do a put_callback and wait for the motor to finish moving.
I’ve pasted one example below, complete with comments explaining what each record does. It uses other sseq records to actually do the home for each motor, which I’ve not included, but it does show the high level sequencing, as well as the safety checks at each step.
Cheers,
Matt
# ///
# /// Home the optics motors in the correct order.
# /// 1) Home DOY.
# /// 2) Move DOY to -240. This is sufficiently 'out' to safely home DOR and DOX.
# /// 3) Check DOY is OK and at safe position # /// 4) Home DOR and DOX together.
# /// 5) Check DOR is OK and at safe position # /// 6) Check DOX is OK and at safe position # /// 7) Move DOY back to what it was originally # /// record(sseq, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home") {
field(WAIT1, "Wait")
field(WAIT2, "Wait")
field(WAIT3, "Wait")
field(WAIT4, "Wait")
field(WAIT5, "Wait")
field(WAIT6, "Wait")
field(WAIT7, "Wait")
field(WAIT8, "Wait")
field(DLY1, "0.0")
field(DOL1, "1")
field(LNK1, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeStatus PP")
field(DLY2, "1.0")
field(DOL2, "1")
field(LNK2, "$(S):Mot:DOY:HomeToLowLimit.PROC CA")
field(DLY3, "1.0")
field(DOL3, "-240.0")
field(LNK3, "$(S):Mot:DOY CA")
field(DLY4, "1.0")
field(DOL4, "1")
field(LNK4, "$(S):Mot:DOY:Home:Check.PROC CA")
field(DLY5, "1.0")
field(DOL5, "1")
field(LNK5, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeDORAndDOX.PROC CA")
field(DLY6, "1.0")
field(DOL6, "1")
field(LNK6, "$(S):Mot:DOR:Home:Check.PROC CA")
field(DLY7, "1.0")
field(DOL7, "1")
field(LNK7, "$(S):Mot:DOX:Home:Check.PROC CA")
field(DLY8, "1.0")
field(DOL8, "1")
field(LNK8, "$(S):Mot:DOY:HomeMBMoveManDef.PROC CA")
field(FLNK, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home:Cleanup") } record(seq, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeDORAndDOX") {
field(DLY1, "0.0")
field(DOL1, "1")
field(LNK1, "$(S):Mot:DOR:HomeToGalilHome.PROC PP")
field(DLY2, "1.0")
field(DOL2, "1")
field(LNK2, "$(S):Mot:DOX:HomeToLowLimit.PROC PP") }
record(seq, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home:Cleanup") {
field(DLY1, "0.0")
field(DOL1, "0")
field(LNK1, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeStatus PP") }
# ///
# /// Homing status flag (for OPI feedback) # /// record(mbbo, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeStatus") {
field(VAL, "0")
field(PINI, "YES")
field(ZRST, "Idle")
field(ONST, "Running")
field(ZRSV, "NO_ALARM")
field(ONSV, "NO_ALARM")
info(archive, "Monitor, 00:00:01, VAL")
}
# ///
# /// Check homing worked for DOY and it's at a safe position # /// record(calcout, "$(S):Mot:DOY:Home:Check") {
field(INPA, "$(S):Mot:DOY:HomeToLowLimit:Status")
field(INPB, "$(S):Mot:DOY:StatusOPI")
field(INPC, "$(S):Mot:DOY.RBV")
field(CALC, "(A!=0)||(B!=0)||(C>-100.0)")
field(OOPT, "When Non-zero")
field(DOPT, "Use CALC")
field(OUT, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home.ABORT PP") }
# ///
# /// Check homing worked for DOR and it's at a safe position # /// record(calcout, "$(S):Mot:DOR:Home:Check") {
field(INPA, "$(S):Mot:DOR:HomeToGalilHome:Status")
field(INPB, "$(S):Mot:DOR:HomeBit")
field(INPC, "$(S):Mot:DOR:StatusOPI")
field(INPD, "$(S):Mot:DOR.RBV")
field(CALC, "(A!=0)||(B!=1)||(C!=0)||(D<-1)||(D>1)")
field(OOPT, "When Non-zero")
field(DOPT, "Use CALC")
field(OUT, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home.ABORT PP") }
# ///
# /// Check homing worked for DOX and it's at a safe position # /// record(calcout, "$(S):Mot:DOX:Home:Check") {
field(INPA, "$(S):Mot:DOX:HomeToLowLimit:Status")
field(INPB, "$(S):Mot:DOX:StatusOPI")
field(INPC, "$(S):Mot:DOX.RBV")
field(CALC, "(A!=0)||(B!=0)||(C<-1)||(C>1)")
field(OOPT, "When Non-zero")
field(DOPT, "Use CALC")
field(OUT, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home.ABORT PP") }
# ///
# /// Abort the above home sequence
# ///
record(dfanout, "$(S):Mot:DO:HomeAbort") {
field(DOL, "1")
field(OUTA, "$(S):Mot:DO:Home.ABORT PP")
field(OUTB, "$(S):Mot:DOY:Home:Abort.PROC PP")
field(OUTC, "$(S):Mot:DOX:Home:Abort.PROC PP")
field(OUTD, "$(S):Mot:DOR:Home:Abort.PROC PP")
field(OUTE, "$(S):Mot:DOY.STOP PP")
field(OUTF, "$(S):Mot:DOX.STOP PP")
field(OUTG, "$(S):Mot:DOR.STOP PP")
}
Data Acquisition and Controls Engineer
Spallation Neutron Source
Oak Ridge National Lab
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:49 AM, David Vine via Tech-talk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for the cleanest way to implement a sequence of moves of between different physical axes but hide it from the user so it appears as just a single pseudo motor axis.
>
> For example, I want to home axis A but to avoid a collision I need to move axes XYZ to a particular location first, then home A, and then move XYZ back to their original position at the end of the homing procedure. And that sequence should occur just clicking the home PV of A.
>
> I would like to set up a pseudo motor driver using an asynMotor driver and implement the logic there. Is it possible to do channel access calls from within an asynMotor driver? I couldn't find any examples. The physical axes are connected across three galil controllers.
>
> Implementing the logic within an SNL program would work but it seemed simpler to do it within the motor driver.
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --
> Best regards,
> David Vine
> (925) 326 7503
> [email protected]
>
>
> 5750 Imhoff Drive, Suite I | Concord, CA 94520 | USA
>
> http://www.Sigray.com
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are provided for the sole use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, proprietary or otherwise protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, forward or otherwise disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original message from your mail system. Thank you.
>
>
> <image001.png>
- Replies:
- Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Maren Purves via Tech-talk
- References:
- Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis David Vine via Tech-talk
- Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Multi-axis sequenced move using asynMotor pseudo axis Pearson, Matthew R. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|