Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
Subject: |
Re: comparison of different CA clients: caproto and pyepics |
From: |
Valentyn Stadnytskyi via Tech-talk <[email protected]> |
To: |
[email protected] |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:38:58 -0400 |
All,
Best, Valentyn
----------------------------------- Valentyn Stadnytskyi
Hello,
I have been working on writing server and clients using caproto and pyepics libraries. I have a simple server written with caproto that has only one PV, '.image’. I can get the image with pyepics or caproto clients. It seems that pyepics client is 2 times slower than caproto. Does anyone know why caproto is faster than pyepics? Is it because the server is written in caproto?
Server is running on the same machine. The image size is 1,3960,3960
Results: One request:pyepics client: 2.068 Average of 10:pyepics client: 1.203
Regards, Valentyn ----------------------------------- Valentyn Stadnytskyi
|
- References:
- comparison of different CA clients: caproto and pyepics Valentyn Stadnytskyi via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
comparison of different CA clients: caproto and pyepics Valentyn Stadnytskyi via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: areaDetector compile problem with ffmpegServer step Michael Westfall via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
comparison of different CA clients: caproto and pyepics Valentyn Stadnytskyi via Tech-talk
- Next:
few questions on autosave Jeong Han Lee via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 10 Oct 2019 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|