Am 14.03.20 um 00:05 schrieb Johnson, Andrew N.:
> Ralph was talking about the server-side filters that were added to
> Base in 3.15.
I thought so.
> Documentation for the filters available in 3.15.7 is
> available at https://epics.anl.gov/base/R3-15/7-docs/filters.html and
> the source code for those filters is found on the 3.15 branch in
> src/std/filters, or for 7.0 under modules/database/src/std/filters.
> The filter sources have a registrar routine that adds a Channel
> Filter Plugin by calling chfPluginRegister(); the IOC implementation
> is inside the dbChannel.c and dbChannel.h parts of the src/ioc/db
> directory.
Thanks, that is quite useful. I haven't looked at the code yet, but I
read the docs and I really like that you guys thought of adding nice and
concise syntax sugar for the array filters. So, if I use the latest 3.15
release (for both server and client), can I expect
caget my_pv.VAL[3]
to work out of the box, or do I have to enable something first?
> However as Ralph said there isn’t a way for a filter to
> modify data that is being written to the IOC yet, so far we only have
> methods for filtering on reads (similar paths are used for both Get
> and Monitor operations).
Hmm. So the existing machinery for server side filters first has to be
extended to cover writes, too. How deep do you think this addition has
to go? I hope it doesn't involve having to delve into the innards of the
CA server implementation to add appropriate hooks there. OTOH, since
filters are now supported for DB links, too, I guess CA doesn't come
into play and the change would be limited to the core database code.
As a side note, given the world-wide Corona crisis, most facilities will
probably shut down operation pretty soon if they didn't already do that
(ours did, for external users at least). Our administration has allowed
us to request extended home office work as a contribution to mitigate
the problem by reducing the infection rate. I mention this only because
it means that during the coming weeks (perhaps months) we may actually
find the time to do some serious hacking...
Cheers
Ben
Attachment:
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
- Replies:
- Re: write to a single element of an array field Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- References:
- write to a single element of an array field Benjamin Franksen via Tech-talk
- Re: write to a single element of an array field Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- Re: write to a single element of an array field Ben Franksen via Tech-talk
- Re: write to a single element of an array field Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: write to a single element of an array field Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: write to a single element of an array field Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: write to a single element of an array field Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: write to a single element of an array field Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
|