Hi Kevin
Thank you for your response.
I tried with UEIP = 1, but then it seems to use the motor 1 encoder (which is just the phase value, or open loop value), and not the m11 encoder that I have setup.
Then it disregards the m11 encoder reading
Guilherme Jovanini Montagner
+55 19 99806.9117
+55 19 2517.8911
guilherme at setup.com.br
Labview Certified Developer
----- Mensagem original -----
De: "Peterson, Kevin M." <kmpeters at anl.gov>
Para: "guilherme" <guilherme at setup.com.br>, "tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 29 de setembro de 2020 10:52:24
Assunto: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level
The motor record issues absolute move command if UEIP and URIP are both
0. It issues relative move commands if UEIP or URIP is 1.
Kevin
On 9/29/20 8:04 AM, Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk wrote:
> It seems that EPICS is issuing "absolute" movements, instead of
> "relative". Commanded position of 3mm shouldn't result in a target of
> 307200 counts for motor 1, but should issue an incremental movement of
> 0,7mm (in this situation), or +71680 counts, and after that, the DIFF
> field should be considered in order to issue further movements
>
> What can justify this behaviour? Did we implement this technique correctly?
> Thank you for your attention.
>
> *Guilherme Jovanini Montagner*
> +55 19 99806.9117
> +55 19 2517.8911
> guilherme at setup.com.br
>
> Labview Certified Developer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Replies:
- Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- References:
- Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk
- Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
|