EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level
From: "Peterson, Kevin M. via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: Guilherme Jovanini Montagner <guilherme at setup.com.br>, tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:24 +0000
The motor record issues absolute move command if UEIP and URIP are both 
0.  It issues relative move commands if UEIP or URIP is 1.

Kevin

On 9/29/20 8:04 AM, Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk wrote:
> It seems that EPICS is issuing "absolute" movements, instead of 
> "relative". Commanded position of 3mm shouldn't result in a target of 
> 307200 counts for motor 1, but should issue an incremental movement of 
> 0,7mm (in this situation), or +71680 counts, and after that, the DIFF 
> field should be considered in order to issue further movements
> 
> What can justify this behaviour? Did we implement this technique correctly?
> Thank you for your attention.
> 	
> *Guilherme Jovanini Montagner*
> +55 19 99806.9117
> +55 19 2517.8911
> guilherme at setup.com.br
> 	
> Labview Certified Developer
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Replies:
Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk
References:
Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Bruno Martins via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Bruno Martins via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Implementing closed loop on EPICS level Guilherme Jovanini Montagner via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 29 Sep 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·