Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On 2/28/24 10: 49, Mark Rivers wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I sent a message to both tech-talk and core-talk at 4: 31 PM CST yesterday. > > This is the tech-talk message: > https: //urldefense. us/v3/__https: //epics. anl. gov/tech-talk/2024/msg00292. php__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZwdZ3Xk90npYJG2u5UDee-4XJj6blyfD6y0v6F77t1vfnH4f0Q7a03CccAeQxSQ1sECGGxUqZl91ThkmL5qzUywVsg$
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On 2/28/24 10:49, Mark Rivers wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I sent a message to both tech-talk and core-talk at 4:31 PM CST yesterday.
>
> This is the tech-talk message:
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://epics.anl.gov/tech-talk/2024/msg00292.php__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZwdZ3Xk90npYJG2u5UDee-4XJj6blyfD6y0v6F77t1vfnH4f0Q7a03CccAeQxSQ1sECGGxUqZl91ThkmL5qzUywVsg$
>
> This is the core-talk message:
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://epics.anl.gov/core-talk/2024/msg00042.php__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZwdZ3Xk90npYJG2u5UDee-4XJj6blyfD6y0v6F77t1vfnH4f0Q7a03CccAeQxSQ1sECGGxUqZl91ThkmL5r4O_RUPg$
>
> However, I did not actually then receive the message from tech-talk. And it seems like maybe you did not either? It seems like tech-talk archived it but did not send it?
No, I didn't receive this second mail. I don't think google spam/d it.
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 12:31 PM
> To: Mark Rivers <rivers at cars.uchicago.edu>
> Subject: Re: pvAccess assert error
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Am I being dense today? I only see a screen capture attached to your original mail.
>
>
> On 2/28/24 10:25, Mark Rivers wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. I sent the full stack trace yesterday.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 12:20 PM
>> To: Mark Rivers <rivers at cars.uchicago.edu>
>> Cc: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov
>> Subject: Re: pvAccess assert error
>>
>> On 2/26/24 16:37, Mark Rivers via Tech-talk wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I am running a new areaDetector camera. It generates frames that are 4096x3072 pixels, 8-bit. I can collect data from the camera at 150 frames/s using a BitFlow CoaXSpress card with no problems. This is on a Windows PC.
>>>
>>> However, when I try to use pvAccess to read the data from the NDPluginPva plugin I get an assert error in pvAccess in my Windows application. The error message is in the attachment.
>>>
>>> This happens when I use the ImageJ pvAccess plugin, and also when I use the following Linux command on another machine:
>>>
>>> $ pvmonitor 13BF1:Pva1:Image > /dev/null
>>>
>>> Any idea what the problem could be? This is base 7.0.7.
>>
>> At a guess, maybe another size()==0 situations as with:
>>
>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/epics-base/pvDataCPP/issues/50__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZwdZ3Xk90npYJG2u5UDee-4XJj6blyfD6y0v6F77t1vfnH4f0Q7a03CccAeQxSQ1sECGGxUqZl91ThkmL5rHQ9t53A$
>>
>> If so, a full stack trace should point at the offending code.
>>
>
- References:
- pvAccess assert error Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- Re: pvAccess assert error Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- RE: pvAccess assert error Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- RE: pvAccess assert error Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: pvAccess assert error Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Reg : How to use custom baud rate such as 125000 for ioc running on Linux Mrinal Bera via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
<2024>
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: pvAccess assert error Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: pvAccess assert error Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
<2024>