Hallo LiangChih Chiang,
You should create you own C++ classes and extend "asynMotorController"
and "asynMotorAxis". You could look into existing code, the EPICS motor
record knows many working implementations for other devices.
You should override some of the functions, at least "poll", "move",
"moveVelocity", "home" and "stop", but as needed other functions too.
The functions should not wait for any move to finish, the "poll"
function is called in regular intervals to check for status and more.
1. The mentioned "int" is not the position, its the asyn index used
for the "setDoubleParam" call of the underlying asynMotorController
class, that it maps the position correctly. Do not forget to call
"callParamCallbacks" after any of the "set...Param" functions.
2. This depends, what unit do you want to control. Often the users
would control the position, which would make more sense. You could
make additional PVs to provide the actual voltage too.
3. If you use "setDoubleParam" together with "motorPosition_", you can
use the whole range of the data type.
4. In your own class, which extends "asynMotorAxis", you should override
"poll". Read the actual positions and some status information of the
device and use "setDoubleParam" or "setIntegerParam". Write to the
pointered flag, if this axis is active (which influences the cycle
time for polling) and call "callParamCallbacks" before returning.
5. From my point of view, the closed-loop mode fits good for controlling
the position, but you might implement other modes too. Please look
into other controller implementations.
The parameter indexed by "motorEncoderPosition_" should be written with
the actual encoder position. The parameter indexed by "motorPosition_"
is for the actual motor position for a system, which makes a difference
between motor and encoder. If there is none, use could write the encoder
position here.
A binary protocol is no problem for asyn, variants (text or binary)
exist in the world.
Best regards,
Lutz
Am 06.02.26 um 08:48 schrieb LiangChih Chiang via Tech-talk:
Hello, EPICS mates,
I started to implement the “Model 3” driver for nanoFaktur EBD-060310
piezo controller.
The attached files(.cpp and .h) are the work-in-progress source code.
Not finished yet.
I have some questions.
1.
In asynMotorController.h, the data type of motorPosition_
and motorEncoderPosition_ are ints.
But in derived class of asynMotorcontroller(like
smarActMCSMotorDriver.cpp and ACRMotorDriver.cpp),
the function setDoubleParam is used to set the above parameters.
Why is that?
2.
I can read the position(unit um, range 0 to 40) and voltage(unit volts,
range -30 to 130) from the controller.
But which one should I set to motorPosition_and motorEncoderPosition_?
I don't quite understand.
3.
The values of position and voltage from the controller are float values.
When setting, say 2.123456, to motorEncoderPosition, it will become 2
(which is an int).
How to handle this situation?
Should I do some kind of transformation? For example, multiply by 1000,000?
4.
In the member function: asynStatus poll(bool* moving_p),
I need to set the moving/done status of the stage to moving_p
and motorStatusDone_.
But there is no such exact suitable command provided by thhe controller.
A possible candidate is "get on-target status" meaning in closed-loop
mode(servo ON),
whether the position(from sensor) approached the set target or not.
5.
The controller has two modes:
closed-loop mode(servo ON), users set the desired potion(unit um).
open-loop mode(servo OFF), uses set the voltage(unit volts).
What should I set to motorPosition_?
I think it should be something like "motor pulse".
what should I set to motorEncoderPosition_.?
I think it should be something like "encoder value".
ps
The controller uses binary communication protocol.
The following example is to read the position(in um) of channel 0:
hexadecimal bytes in little-endian:
10 00 01 20 02 00 20 00 00 ac 01 00 00 00 00 fe
10 00: total length, 16 bytes
01 20: command ID, 0x2001 means "get position"
02 00: custom ID, used to distinguish different client programs.
20: option, 0x20 means "read"
00: sequence number, Used in very long responses. Not used in commands.
00: interface id, RS-232 or USB or Ethernet. Not used in commands.
ac: header checksum
01: data format, 01 means 32-bit unsigned int
00 00 00 00: data, channel 0
fe: checksum
The response:
13 00 01 20 02 00 10 00 01 b8 00 00 02 70 74 6a 3e
13 00: total length, 19 bytes
01 20: command ID, 0x2001 means "get position"
02 00: custom ID, used to distinguish different client programs.
10: option, 0x10 means "final, no more".
00: sequence number,
01: interface id, 0x01 means RS-232.
b8: header checksum
00: data format, 00 means 8-bit unsigned int
00: data, channel 0
02: data format, 02 means float
70 74 6a 3e: data, 0.228960 (position in um)
3e: checksum
Any suggestions and responses are appreciated.
Thank you.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:31 AM Mark Rivers <rivers at cars.uchicago.edu
<mailto:rivers at cars.uchicago.edu>> wrote:
* I think I would need to write the EPICS motor driver module for
it.____
__ __
That is correct. You should write a “Model 3” driver, meaning it is
a C++ driver derived from the base classes asynMotorController and
asynMotorAxis.____
__ __
I just looked at the manual for the nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310. It uses
a non-standard binary communications protocol, not ASCII strings.
That is unusual, most controllers use ASCII communication.____
__ __
The driver you suggested as a model,
https://github.com/epics-motor/motorPIGCS2
<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/github.com/epics-motor/motorPIGCS2__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YgABnMrr4ouWf_GcXAuVe7LU-96lfvWFNG96utdBA3mgcrk9dBsWVY7JQtxclFMQQYwD2Zz0RmrbQGad8OJXFPc$> is fairly complex because of the class hierarchy, so you might want to start with something simpler as your example. ____
__ __
https://github.com/epics-motor/motorSmarAct/blob/master/smarActApp/src/smarActMCSMotorDriver.cpp <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/epics-motor/motorSmarAct/blob/master/smarActApp/src/smarActMCSMotorDriver.cpp__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YLctRUSDiyz4K-t8_BzT33ew7q6EOnMR2oSaoEqf7fY5hpd5mII4cyq4pP6Gt3vwMPp1s38VSS7kXyY4shD2qrU$>____
__ __
That uses ASCII communication, but it should not be too hard to take
the concepts and use binary communication.____
__ __
Mark____
__ __
__ __
__ __
__ __
__ __
*From:*Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov
<mailto:tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov>> *On Behalf Of *LiangChih
Chiang via Tech-talk
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 23, 2025 1:41 AM
*To:* tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <mailto:tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
*Subject:* Support for piezo controller nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310____
__ __
Hello, EPICS mates,____
__ __
I need to control a piezo sage with the controller nanoFAKTUR
EBD-060310.____
This is my first time using this controller.____
I searched and couldn't find the EPICS support module for it.____
__ __
I think I would need to write the EPICS motor driver module for it.____
__ __
What module code would you recommend me to use as a starter
reference?____
For example, something like ____
EPICS motor drivers for Physik Instrumente GCS2 (General Command
Set) compatible controllers____
https://github.com/epics-motor/motorPIGCS2
<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/github.com/epics-motor/motorPIGCS2__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YgABnMrr4ouWf_GcXAuVe7LU-96lfvWFNG96utdBA3mgcrk9dBsWVY7JQtxclFMQQYwD2Zz0RmrbQGad8OJXFPc$> ____
__ __
__ __
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur
- References:
- Re: Support for piezo controller nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310 LiangChih Chiang via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Support for piezo controller nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310 LiangChih Chiang via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: EPICS support for Micro4 controller from World Precision Instruments Heinz Junkes via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Support for piezo controller nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310 LiangChih Chiang via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Support for piezo controller nanoFAKTUR EBD-060310 Torsten Bögershausen via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
|