Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 <2026>	Index	1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 <2026>
<== Date ==>		<== Thread ==>

Subject:	Re: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types?
From:	Ralph Lange via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To:	EPICS Tech Talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date:	Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:01:59 +0200

On Fri, 25 Sept 2026 at 18:19, William Badgett via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:

Is there any plan to create a centrally supported signed or unsigned 64 bit integers as the value field in NTScalar ?

Not sure what you mean; the scalar type in the NT spec contains 64 bit integers.

Cheers,

~Ralph

References:: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? William Badgett via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:: Prev: Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk; Next: Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? Mark Rivers via Tech-talk; Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 <2026>
Navigate by Thread:: Prev: Re: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? Sky Brewer via Tech-talk; Next: Fanout with mask - unclear documentation on SHFT Rea Domitrović via Tech-talk; Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 <2026>

ANJ, 30 Sep 2026