Hi all,
I'm looking into using fanout records with SELM set to "Mask," and I noticed in the documentation (https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://docs.epics-controls.org/projects/base/en/latest/fanoutRecord.html__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!c6VtxanZO2etJoilWMZIBt7Glftdik3rzeRh8trQ_ihG5yhW8C4rRyYnYAUceWjULGXpTTG5MigtRnj0CXjUX7bGiZWpYg$ ) and existing IOCs that the SHFT field is by default set to -1. If that is the case, a mask value of (for example) 511, with SHFT not explicitly set, would cause LNK1-LNK9 to be processed, but not LNK0. Further, I noticed that the seq record documentation (https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://docs.epics-controls.org/projects/base/en/latest/seqRecord.html__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!c6VtxanZO2etJoilWMZIBt7Glftdik3rzeRh8trQ_ihG5yhW8C4rRyYnYAUceWjULGXpTTG5MigtRnj0CXjUX7av4QMcbA$ ) contains the following disclaimer about SHFT:
> To use the DO0, DOL0, LNK0, DLY0 fields when SELM = Mask, the SHFT field must be explicitly set to ZERO.
My question: Is the same true of the fanout record? In either case, the documentation should be updated to match reality. Best regards,
Rea Domitrović
Institut Ruđer Bošković
Zagreb, Croatia
- Replies:
- Re: Fanout with mask - unclear documentation on SHFT Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? William Badgett via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Fanout with mask - unclear documentation on SHFT Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Fanout with mask - unclear documentation on SHFT Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
|