Subject: |
Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base |
From: |
Jeff Hill <[email protected]> |
To: |
Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:22:22 -0000 |
Committed a fix, but I am unable to build for this version of Solaris here so we may need to iterate.
The _nv versions are necessary because, in our interface, we return the result of the atomic operation to the user. Its slightly more efficient on certain architectures to, for example, increment a counter and not check the result but typically I check for overflow so perhaps the overhead is unavoidable in typical use cases. Admittedly, the interface design was a judgment call based on providing what we need while implementing a minimum set of data types and functions.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics/+merge/73915
Your team EPICS Core Developers is subscribed to branch lp:epics-base.
- Replies:
- Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base Andrew Johnson
- References:
- [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: Atomic operation library and spin-lock for the epics ring buffer Williams Jr., Ernest L.
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: [Merge] lp:~epics-core/epics-base/rebased-atomics into lp:epics-base Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|