On 04/17/2018 09:31 PM, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
> Why wouldn’t you put the workaround in the file CONFIG.Common.RTEMS where you don’t need a conditional test?
Do you mean in Base or external modules? If Base, then because I wanted
to hear from you first. If external, I don't think this works with
$(OS_CLASS) granularity.
> I haven’t looked into why you’re only just noticing this now, but there are a few possibilities that I could come up with.
My guess is that it will come down to a mixture of not enough RTEMS/vxworks
builds, with a dose of GNUMake trivia thrown in.
I noticed this when adding a new generated header in pva2pva. At first
I assumed it was a dep. problem on my end. However, while a clean
sequential (not -j) build was always successful. A clean parallel build
would sometimes fail. When it did fail, a sequential rebuild would also
fail. Which is when I noticed the missing '-p'.
This is coming from either RTEMS 4.9.6 or 4.10.2. Both install
'make/host.cfg', and I can't remember the order in which I built them.
- Replies:
- Re: obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Andrew Johnson
- References:
- obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Michael Davidsaver
- Re: obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Johnson, Andrew N.
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Johnson, Andrew N.
- Next:
Re: CA get of zero length array Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Johnson, Andrew N.
- Next:
Re: obscure EPICS+RTEMS makefile problem Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|