Am 13.04.20 um 07:19 schrieb Michael Davidsaver:
> I tried to make a start of going through the now many (maybe) interrelated merge requests
> arising to Dirk's dbChannelForDBLinks work. Unfortunately, I have gotten quite confused.
>
> Is Dirk's original https://code.launchpad.net/~dirk.zimoch/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/378968
> still the place to start?
Yes. All my branches build on that one, except one. To avoid conflicts
with changes made on branch 7.0 in the meantime, I started by merging
7.0 on top of Dirk's HEAD before I made my own changes.
The one exception is reformat-dbAccess which directly forks off branch 7.0.
> @Ben, which of you MRs do you consider ready for review? That is,
> where you aren't planning further changes.
All of them. However, the latest one (branch address-modifiers) was
already commented on in detail by Andrew, so I will likely make further
changes there. The others are stable as far as I am concerned.
> Two of these are MRs are for branches which depend on other feature
> branches with do not have active MRs. Should we be looking at these?
These listed dependencies are bogus, i.e. they were inherited from
previous versions. I will re-submit the two merge proposals with updated
dependencies.
In historical order:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bfrk/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/381153
(trivial code reformat)
https://code.launchpad.net/~bfrk/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/381153
This is a pure refactor with no new features. It only depends on Dirk's
dbChannelForDBLinks.
https://code.launchpad.net/~bfrk/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/381307
The dependency on the listed branch is a left-over from a previous
version. I will re-submit this one. It depends on the previous merge
proposal.
https://code.launchpad.net/~bfrk/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/381307
Similar. The dependency is bogus and needs to be replaced.
Review in progress:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bfrk/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/381628
This is the main feature I have been aiming at. Andrew made a few
comments and suggested a generalization. I am working on that. The
dependency (branch address-modifiers-prerequisites) is an alias for
zero-size-array-request which is merge request 381308.
Cheers
Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- merge requests for dbChannelForDBLinks et al. Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: MSVC printf/vararg weirdness Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Next:
[Merge] ~bfrk/epics-base:scalar-get-optimization into epics-base:7.0 Ben Franksen via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
merge requests for dbChannelForDBLinks et al. Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Next:
MSVC printf/vararg weirdness Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
|