Maybe the assumption is that a value borrowed from a record will never need cleanup? Then:
1. type==dbfl_type_val && !dtor
2. type==dbfl_type_ref && dtor
3. type==dbfl_type_ref && !dtor
I'm not sure this is necessarily always true. I've been toying with the idea of involving db_field_log in reference counting where a record and and some db_field_log would share ownership. I haven't completely worked this through.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~dirk.zimoch/epics-base/+git/epics-base/+merge/399414
Your team EPICS Core Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0.
- References:
- [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0 Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0 Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0 Ben Franksen via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0 Ben Franksen via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:FilterForInfoFields into epics-base:7.0 Ben Franksen via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
|