Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped?

[Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

On 4/17/25 08:13, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
> On 4/17/25, 9:27 AM, "Michael Davidsaver" <mdavidsaver at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/16/25 09:34, Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk wrote:
>
> > I saw that a new Fedora was release very recently.
> Yes.  Now comes GCC 15, which defaults to C23.
>
> ... Ah that wasn’t a PR, and your Fedora CI job did fail,
I noticed this first failure during a PVXS build, and made a quick fix
hoping that this would be the only issue.  No such luck...


> but apparently we don’t get notifications when non-PR jobs fail. Can/should we change that in the CI?
Not that I know of, but GHA gets new options all the time.


> Looking at the specific code that’s failing, in this case I think the fix is just adding a cast to DEVSUPFUN* since we only print the pointer. I just pushed a commit to try that, this job <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnEDCtYeyPQ$ > shows that seemed to work <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393*step:8:4731__;Iw!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnECnboF3HA$ >, but there are other similar failures later in the build <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393*step:8:6704__;Iw!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnEBPdWAjWg$ >, which I will look at.
>
> - Andrew
>
> --
>
> Complexity comes for free, Simplicity you have to work for.