EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record?
From: Andrew Johnson <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:43:07 -0500
Hi Brian,

On 03/18/2014 02:57 PM, Brian Bevins wrote:
> Hmm. When I run casr on my ioc, I get back one priority value per
> client, not one per channel. And all of the priorities are currently
> zero. Should this output look different if I were setting priority on a
> per channel basis from the client?

The CA client has to use a separate TCP connection to the server for
each priority, so internally the server groups them by connection and
hence by priority.

For experimental purposes the caget and camonitor programs can be
configured to use a particular priority (-p <prio> where <prio> is 0-99
with 0 as the default & lowest priority). I would suggest setting up one
camonitor of your waveform records with default priority and a second
one with higher priority on the faster channels. If this resolves the
stuttering it tells you that it's probably worth exploring this approach
further.

HTH,

- Andrew
-- 
Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human
intelligence long enough to get money from it. -- Stephen Leacock

Replies:
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
References:
Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Ralph Lange
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Ralph Lange
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins

Navigate by Date:
Prev: how to ... in CSS BOY? Jemian, Pete R.
Next: RE: Bayer vs RGB1 performance for Prosilica cameras Mark Rivers
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
Next: Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  <20142015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 17 Dec 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·