Hi Brian,
On 03/18/2014 02:57 PM, Brian Bevins wrote:
> Hmm. When I run casr on my ioc, I get back one priority value per
> client, not one per channel. And all of the priorities are currently
> zero. Should this output look different if I were setting priority on a
> per channel basis from the client?
The CA client has to use a separate TCP connection to the server for
each priority, so internally the server groups them by connection and
hence by priority.
For experimental purposes the caget and camonitor programs can be
configured to use a particular priority (-p <prio> where <prio> is 0-99
with 0 as the default & lowest priority). I would suggest setting up one
camonitor of your waveform records with default priority and a second
one with higher priority on the faster channels. If this resolves the
stuttering it tells you that it's probably worth exploring this approach
further.
HTH,
- Andrew
--
Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human
intelligence long enough to get money from it. -- Stephen Leacock
- Replies:
- Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- References:
- Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Ralph Lange
- Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Ralph Lange
- Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
how to ... in CSS BOY? Jemian, Pete R.
- Next:
RE: Bayer vs RGB1 performance for Prosilica cameras Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- Next:
Re: Prioritizing Channel Access per Record? Brian Bevins
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|