Am Tue, 5 Dec 2023 08:20:05 +0100
schrieb Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>:
> As this works fine with all other records, it looks to me like the
> scanning field (I/O Intr), maybe in combination with StreamDevice, is
> causing my trouble here. Is this expected behaviour? How can I achieve
> that caput changes are recognised by camonitor on I/O Intr records?
I worked around this by creating an extra dummy record with I/O Intr
scanning and using redirection for all other channels containing the
actual data. This gets me the desired behaviour, but I still wonder why
I/O Intr records behave so differently.
cu
Gerrit
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Replies:
- Re: camonitor vs caput Érico Nogueira Rolim via Tech-talk
- References:
- camonitor vs caput Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
camonitor vs caput Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: camonitor vs caput Érico Nogueira Rolim via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
camonitor vs caput Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: camonitor vs caput Érico Nogueira Rolim via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
|