>I would like for burt to handle arrays larger than it can currently handle, say
>~2000 integers. This would be useful to save and restore the settings of a GPIB
>instrument, like a Tektronix RTD720 or a Tektronix SCD1000 waveform digitizer.
You are not the only one. Regrettably, this artificial limit has nothing to do
with BURT. BURT has no internal limits and (hopefully) never will. The problem
you cite is related to the buffer allocation size that Channel Access uses.
I believe this buffer size issue is one of the canidates for change in CA version 4.
Jeff Hill is the guy you should be talking to about removing the dependancy on the
static buffer size(s).
FYI --
There is supposedly a macro (what a shock!) in the CA header files somewhere that
you can change and rebuild everything to use a larger buffer allocation... if that
suits your needs. Again Jeff is the guy for the details. It should not coma as
any suprise that the current buffer size is set to 16K [= ~2000 * sizeof(int).]
--John
- References:
- Re: BURT modifications in progress James F. Harrison
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived William Lupton
- Next:
Re: NT changes for 3.12.2 Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: BURT modifications in progress James F. Harrison
- Next:
description Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|