Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

This MEDM work is really very intersting; at SLAC we're trying to use DM as 
the standard display and are working with Los Alamos to get things upgraded. 
I use a lot of waveforms and compressed records which are much easier to use 
in MEDM though. (One of my current tasks is to define what changes I'd like 
to see made to DM waveform support). So I'm not an anti-MEDM person.

It was my understanding that the collaboration was leaning towards using one 
display manager, that DM was to be upgraded to include some of the new 
things included in MEDM when it was created (as a Motif upgrade of DM). Did 
I completely misunderstand? Is the DM/MEDM question a long-festering wound? 
Will it (has it) become a religious war?

/Ron

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Oh no! It's another GPIB/NI-1014_hardware/software feature! Bill Brown

Next: Re: MEDM makes a next step, doesn't it? Chip Watson

Index: 1994  1995  1996  <1997>  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Oh no! It's another GPIB/NI-1014_hardware/software feature! Bill Brown

Next: RE: MEDM upgrade message Matthias Clausen DESY -MKS-2/KRYK-

Index: 1994  1995  1996  <1997>  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024