EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  <20022003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  <20022003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: Recommendations for Power PC VME cards
From: Kevin Tsubota <[email protected]>
To: "'Andrew Johnson'" <[email protected]>, Dennis Armstrong <[email protected]>
Cc: "Tech Talk (EPICS)" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:08:47 -1000
Here at Keck we went from FRC40s to MVME-2307s with 64MB RAM.
This is with EPICS R3.13.0beta12 and VxWorks 5.3.1 (Tornado-1).

We ran into two issues:
- we had disable the floating point underflow/overflow
- we also ran into the VxWorks 24-bit relocation error

Kevin Tsubota
W.M. Keck Observatory

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:37 AM
> To: Dennis Armstrong
> Cc: Tech Talk (EPICS)
> Subject: Re: Recommendations for Power PC VME cards
> 
> 
> Hi Dennis,
> 
> Dennis Armstrong wrote:
> 
> > We are considering an upgrade to our systems to use the 
> Power PC range
> > of VME CPU cards .  So the  question is  which VME CPU 
> cards do EPICS
> > users  use?
> 
> APS have experience with the MVME2700 and MVME2100 boards, 
> and we're in 
> the process of getting the MVME5100 for some applications.  
> The latter 
> family appears to be where Motorola are concentrating their 
> development 
> efforts, although the other lines aren't likely to be closed 
> out anytime 
> soon.  To use the 5100 series you'll need Tornado 2.1 or 2.2, 
> whereas the 
> older boards can be used with earlier versions even back to 
> T1.0.1 (not 
> that I'd recommend that though).
> 
> You should look at your I/O requirements for the CPU board - 
> if you don't 
> need more serial ports and other I/O then don't pay extra for 
> stuff you 
> don't need.  The MVME2100 is a low-cost board which is 
> slightly slower 
> than the 2300/2400/2600/2700 devices but works fine for most purposes.
> 
> > Which are most compatible with the EPICS software?
> 
> In general EPICS compatibility isn't likely to be a problem 
> for almost any 
> PowerPC CPU.  There may be some changes you might want/need 
> to make to the 
> BSP to get some drivers going, but most devices Just Work? 
> (as long as 
> you're using EPICS R3.13.6 or later).
> 
> - Andrew
> -- 
> "Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans." 
> - John Lennon
> 

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Recommendations for Power PC VME cards Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: old/new MVME-177 compatability Peregrine M. McGehee
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  <20022003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Recommendations for Power PC VME cards Till Straumann
Next: Another SPARC alignment bug in 3.14_beta1 Till Straumann
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  <20022003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·