>>> On 1/30/2006 at 12:16:55 +0100, Luedeke Andreas wrote:
> Of course the same can be done already with "calcout" chains. But a
> single record to control a sequence would simplify matters.
The calcout record is also one of the largest because it has all the calc
code in it, thus being very inefficient if you don't actually need to calc
anything.
I use seq or simple soft output records instead of calcout wherever
possible for that reason.
----
Brian McAllister Senior Software Engineer
[email protected] Bates Research & Engineering Center
(617) 253-9537 Middleton, MA
- References:
- Re: enhanced seq record Luedeke Andreas
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: enhanced seq record Brian McAllister
- Next:
RE: enhanced seq record Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: enhanced seq record Luedeke Andreas
- Next:
Re: enhanced seq record Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·