![]() |
![]() ![]()
Experimental Physics and
| ||||||||||||||
|
We have been tasked with designing an interlock system involving the measurement of our Insertion Devices here at the APS. Being a machine protection system, it would be preferable to use an independent source of measurement than is currently used by the control system. In the past it has been an awkward problem coming up with accurate absolute measurements of the gap due primarily to the fact that - by necessity - the area to be measured is typically under a high radiation environment. I'm trying to approach this problem from a fresh start - without any of the existing baggage currently encumbering the control system. So my question to everyone is simple to state, but I cannot come up with a reasonable solution: 1) For each Insertion Device (ID) the system will need accurate (within a few microns) and absolute measurement of the gap in two places (up and down-stream). 2) The transducers need to be radiation "proof" - things like plastics, teflon and electronics will not survive long enough (if at all) to be viable In a nutshell, that's really it. I've investigated a few leads which seem promising, but would like to hear fresh ideas from the experts (you guys). Thanks in advance, --Josh
| ||||||||||||||
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 |
![]() · Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing · |