Re: subArray processing

[Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@i-tech.si>]

Carl Lionberger wrote:
> Hi Hinko,
> 
> From a quick look at the camonitor code it seems to be using a low-level
> element count derived from channel access activity for its printout. For
> a generic client of this sort such an approach is reasonable.
> 
> I think you should use MALM of 2.  This should work and would reduce the
> trailing zero count
> 

Ok, this works as you pointed out, the number of trailing zeros is
reduced to 1.
I'm not sure what our end users will use instead of camonitor and how it
handles the subArray..

Thank you,
Hinko

-- 
Hinko Kocevar
Technical support engineer
Instrumentation Technologies
Velika pot 22, SI-5250 Solkan - Slovenia
T:+386 5 3352600, F:+386 5 3352601
mailto: hinko.kocevar@i-tech.si

http://www.i-tech.si - When your users demand stability