Dear Mr. Martin ,
thanks for your reply
Yes, I am gettiing 16 elements correctly for each subarray but have zeros on elements 17 - 63 for each subArray.
I have put MALM for each subarray as 16 ( same as NELM = 16). Now the element count is coming correct but data in subArray2,3,4 is not correct.
The output now is
(64, [0.27133380897133985, 0.79951261848013366, 0.10564437214412981, ... 0.9708053208969406])
('subarrays = 1', 16, [0.27133380897133985, ......., 0.66130227225711835]) ('subarrays = 2', 16, [0.66130227225711835, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0])
('subarrays = 3', 16, [0.66130227225711835, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]) ('subarrays = 4', 16, [0.66130227225711835, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0])
Thanks again for anticipated suggestions,
Best regards, Ritesh Sugandhi
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Martin L. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
In your subArray record set the MALM field to the same as the NELM field.
According to the record reference manual under the heading Array Parameters
the MALM field is used to allocate the memory for the array. It looks like
you are getting the 16 elements correctly but have zeros on elements 17 - 63
for each subArray.
See if this helps,
Marty
Ritesh Sugandhi wrote:
Dear sir
I am having a array of double consist of 64 elements and connected to 4 sub-arrays of size 16. I assigned the random numbers to main array . now when I take elements count for each subarray array and display its output. I got each sub-array is assigned with the 64 elements (instead of 16) and appended by 0 at the end elements .
The code output and database schema is included in mail. Please correct if my understanding is not correct.
Thanking you and Best regards,
Ritesh Sugandhi
*Output is as below::*
(64, [0.15680341096341543, …0.27939076994606538])
('subarrays = 1', 64, [0.15680341096341543,…, 0.6660663007380897,0.0,…. 0.0])
('subarrays = 2', 64, [0.87466558395868221,… 0.59892465207930756, 0.0, …., 0.0])
('subarrays = 3', 64, [0.20673443822330728,…., 0.34672371303892258, 0.0,… 0.0])
('subarrays = 4', 64, [0.47304895704158478,…, 0.27939076994606538, 0.0, ….0.0])
[sugandr@trunk pydev]$
*code is as below::*
from CaChannel import *
import random
driver = CaChannel()
driver.searchw('Py:wave_test')
sub1 = CaChannel()
sub1.searchw('Py:subArr1')
sub2 = CaChannel()
sub2.searchw('Py:subArr2')
sub3 = CaChannel()
sub3.searchw('Py:subArr3')
sub4 = CaChannel()
sub4.searchw('Py:subArr4')
#put randome number in driver
driver.putw([random.random() for x in range(64)])
print(driver.element_count(), driver.getw())
print('subarrays = 1', sub1.element_count(),sub1.getw())
print('subarrays = 2', sub1.element_count(),sub2.getw())
print('subarrays = 3', sub1.element_count(),sub3.getw())
print('subarrays = 4', sub1.element_count(),sub4.getw())
EPICS environment is 3.14.12 and RHEL 5.5 64 bit version using CaChannel v1.6 library
Data base schema is
record(subArray, "$(P)subArr1") { field(NELM, "16")
field(INP, "$(P)wave_test.VAL")
field(INDX, "0")
field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
field(MALM, "64")
}
record(subArray, "$(P)subArr2") { field(NELM, "16")
field(INP, "$(P)wave_test.VAL")
field(INDX, "16")
field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
field(MALM, "64")
}
record(subArray, "$(P)subArr3") {
field(NELM, "16")
field(INP, "$(P)wave_test.VAL")
field(INDX, "32")
field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
field(MALM, "64")
}
record(subArray, "$(P)subArr4") {
field(NELM, "16")
field(INP, "$(P)wave_test.VAL")
field(INDX, "48")
field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
field(MALM, "64")
}
record(fanout, "$(P)mylinker") {
field(FLNK, "$(P)subArr1")
field(LNK1, "$(P)subArr3")
field(LNK2, "$(P)subArr2")
field(LNK3, "$(P)subArr4")
}
record(waveform, "$(P)wave_test") {
field(NELM, "64")
field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
field(EGU, "Counts")
field(SCAN, "Passive")
field(FLNK, "$(P)mylinker")
}
- Replies:
- Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Burkhard Kolb
- Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Matt Newville
- References:
- regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Ritesh Sugandhi
- Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Martin L. Smith
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Martin L. Smith
- Next:
Re: Handling of a character waveform of 64k elements Matt Newville
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Martin L. Smith
- Next:
Re: regarding CaChannel v1.6 handling of dynamic subarrays Burkhard Kolb
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|