Re: Stream device - general concept how to use

[Christian Pauly via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

Thanks for the advice

Linking the set-records to the corresponding get-status records is 
indeed a very good idea.
Connecting all the get-records together via forward-links sounds a bit 
unpractical for maintenance.
Maybe then its better to use a single (or nested if one is not enough) 
Fanout records for regular scanning of all status-records ?
I am still wondering why there is nothing foreseen to get prompt 
execution of a record (and its protocol) once its read via caget (prior 
to returning the result).
This would be similar to the PP ProcessPassive flag mechanism when using 
input links.