Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Christian Pauly via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> · Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:55:53 +0200

Thanks for the advice

Linking the set-records to the corresponding get-status records is

indeed a very good idea.

Connecting all the get-records together via forward-links sounds a bit

unpractical for maintenance.

Maybe then its better to use a single (or nested if one is not enough)

Fanout records for regular scanning of all status-records ?

I am still wondering why there is nothing foreseen to get prompt

execution of a record (and its protocol) once its read via caget (prior

to returning the result).

This would be similar to the PP ProcessPassive flag mechanism when using

input links.