EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  <20212022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  <20212022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: EPID Record
From: Ben Franksen via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Cc: "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 00:44:58 +0100
Hi Mark

I slightly re-arranged your reply.

Am 13.02.21 um 13:32 schrieb Mark Rivers:
>> Suppose we have been at the target position for some time, i.e. 
>> VAL=OVAL, so that E(n)=0 for all n. Then all terms become 0 and the
>> output is OVAL=0 as well. But shouldn't it be OVAL=VAL instead?
> Your statement that "we have been at the target position for some 
> time, i.e. VAL=OVAL" is also incorrect.  When it is at the target 
> position VAL=CVAL, not OVAL.
Yes, sorry, I have confused OVAL and CVAL here.

> I think your statement that "all terms become 0" is incorrect.  The 
> integral term (I) does not become zero even when sitting at the 
> desired setpoint for infinite time, because it is the integral from 
> time=T0, where T0 is the time that the feedback was turned on.
So that means if we start the feedback when E=VAL-CVAL=0 then we will
first move the system *away* from the desired VAL (unless it happens to
be equal to zero). Then we accumulate the errors, increasing I at each
step, until after a while I is large enough to compensate our initial error.

That means KI must *always* be non-zero. I find it a bit strange that it
initially has to move away from the correct output value only to arrive
at that value some steps later. Is it possible to preload the I with a
non-zero value if one has a good guess what its initial value should be?

> The integral term is what prevents "droop", e.g. it is what supplies 
> the constant power required to keep a furnace at 500 C even when the 
> error is 0.
Ok, I think I understand this now. Thanks.

> I use the EPID record for lots of tasks and it seems to work fine. 
> Have you observed an issue which led you to post this message?
Not me personally. Some physicists wanted to understand the behavior of
one of our control loops better, looked at the formula and came up with
the above objection. I agree that with a non-zero KI it should work
(after enough initial cycles).

Cheers
Ben
-- 
I would rather have questions that cannot be answered, than answers that
cannot be questioned.  -- Richard Feynman


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Replies:
Re: EPID Record Jemian, Pete R. via Tech-talk
Re: EPID Record Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
References:
EPICS Record Ben Franksen via Tech-talk
Re: EPID Record Ben Franksen via Tech-talk
Re: EPID Record Mark Rivers via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: EPID Record Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Next: Re: EPID Record Jemian, Pete R. via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  <20212022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: EPID Record Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Next: Re: EPID Record Jemian, Pete R. via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  <20212022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 13 Feb 2021 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·