Re: urldefense.us URLs? (was: New Git mirror for the SNL-Sequencer (code and docs))

["J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

On 04/02, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> On 04/02, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
> > I don't think we're going to get an exception from the URL rewriting implemented by ProofPoint. I considered the idea of trying to strip it out before writing messages to the tech-talk archive, but that's not easy. Many emails now come base64-encoded with multi-part content, and if a message containing a decorated URL is signed, stripping the decoration off would break that signature. Note that ProofPoint do recognize signed messages and don't try to decorate the signed sections, so if you want your messages to not get decorated sign them before sending to the list.
> > 
> > Below are some excerpts from Argonne's FAQ about ProofPoint. I've personally stopped worrying about this, it does work as advertised for me.
> 
> Bummer. :-(  As I'm sure you know, I completely disagree with this for
> the reasons I already stated upthread.  Any chance of hosting the EPICS
> mailing lists elsewhere then?

Any word on hosting the EPICS mailing lists elsewhere?  Or, is there
anything I could do to help with requesting an exception?  ANL's policy
is just crazy here.  I can see forcing their policy on ANL employees
when mail is delivered to each of their inboxes, but this is happening
on a mailing list that, by definition, has no inbox.  If ANL is going
to do this kind of URL rewriting, it should be done before delivery to
each ANL employee's inbox, not before being sent to all the recipients
of a mailing list.  And I don't think I mentioned it earlier, but it
also messes up the mailing list archives because now URLs are wrapped in
these urldefense.us URLs, which means the urldefense.us URLs must remain
valid and functional for as long as the archives are expected to last.

Lewis