On Monday 11 July 2005 14:55, Marty Kraimer wrote:
> Also templates should not appear in the DBD files. This can be done
> by properly defining interfaces which are implemented by "record
> fragment".
Hmm. Can you explain how, for instance, an 'invalidOutput' struct can be
specified in the DBD so that it is usable as building block for
stringout as well as ao record type, without parameterizing over the
type of the value?
> There should not be ANY language specific definitions in DBD or DB
> files.
Note, in my original proposal (on the wiki), there is not a single
mentioning of a C or C++ language feature in the DBD file. If you
insist, I can write down a precise and self-contained definition of the
meaning of the angle-brackets notation I used in the DBD fragments I
posted.
Ben
- Replies:
- Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- References:
- V4 iocRecord: forward linking Ralph Lange
- Re: Record support and user-defined fields Andrew Johnson
- Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Record support and user-defined fields Marty Kraimer
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|