Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Dirk Zimoch <[email protected]> · Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:36:08 +0200

Works. Thanks. The newer compilers seem to agree that if A is a friend

then A::B is a fiend as well. The older compiler seems to have a

different opinion on friendship.

On 19.09.2018 20:06, Michael Davidsaver wrote:

I've made an attempt to fix this with https://github.com/epics-base/pvDataCPP/commit/a02a60c6580572f1e2945b3ebccb7c1eabfc40f8

On 09/18/2018 12:28 AM, Dirk Zimoch wrote:

The compiler is gcc 3.4.4 from vxWorks 6.3.

On 18.09.2018 09:17, Dirk Zimoch wrote:

Hi,

I wondered why I have not seen anything in our Jenkins and just found out that the settings were broken and I have not actually built anything for the last few weeks.

After fixing it I got success for 3.14, 3.15, 3.16 and failure for 7.

../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp: In member function `size_t epics::pvData::Structure::getFieldIndex(const std::string&) const':
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp:529: warning: converting of negative value `-0x00000000000000001' to `size_t'
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp: In member function `size_t epics::pvData::Union::getFieldIndex(const std::string&) const':
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp:723: warning: converting of negative value `-0x00000000000000001' to `size_t'
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp: In static member function `static void epics::pvData::FieldCreate::Helper::cache(const epics::pvData::FieldCreate*, boost::shared_ptr<T>&) [with FLD = epics::pvData::BoundedString]':
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp:1134:   instantiated from here
../pv/pvIntrospect.h:352: error: `unsigned int epics::pvData::Field::m_hash' is private
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp:58: error: within this context
../../src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp:1134:   instantiated from here

This error actually popped up several times.

Dirk

On 14.09.2018 23:10, Andrew Johnson wrote:

So why hasn't Travis been sending me emails about the broken epics-base
builds that I've been pushing? It's a shame that the final 3.14.12.8
build failed on Travis, but I'm not going to fix it and re-tag. I
assumed that the absence of emails from it was an indication of no build
problems, but no... (I haven't even checked Appveyor).

I really don't understand how/when Travis (and Appveyor for that matter)
decide when they should email me; can anyone explain where/how I should
change my settings to ensure that it does?

- Andrew

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System