EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: 64-bit records
From: Timo Korhonen via Core-talk <[email protected]>
To: Michael Davidsaver <[email protected]>, "Williams Jr., Ernest L." <[email protected]>
Cc: EPICS Core Talk <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:37:06 +0000
As commented on the tracker, I re-built and tested, now it works. Thanks
Michael for the super fast fix!

@Ernest: Michael already replied concerning testing. You can also build an
IOC, pointing to the 7.0.2 base and the latest fix by Michael.

Nothing very special is needed; I attached the makefile and st.cmd that I
used, just for reference.

Just add records something like this:

record(int64in, "verylongIn")
{
  field(DTYP,"Soft Channel")
}
record(int64out, "verylongOut")
{
  field(DTYP,"Soft Channel")
}

(I added the DTYP, just to be sure. Would be the default anyway.)


Cheers,

Timo


On 08/01/19 17:00, "Michael Davidsaver" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 1/8/19 3:08 AM, Timo Korhonen via Core-talk wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I made a quick try to use the 64-bit record types (int64in/int64out)
>>with base 7.0.2.
>> 
>> Trying to pvget the record, I get the following message on the IOC
>>console:
>> 
>> epics> 2019-01-08T11:43:50.309 an exception caught while in
>>receiveThread at ../../src/remote/codec.cpp:1144: Unsupported DBR code
>
>https://github.com/search?q=%22Unsupported+DBR+code%22&type=Code
>
>points to QSRV.
>
>> And pvget times out. With caget, I can read the value but as expected,
>>I do not get the 64-bit integer (because ca does not support it,
>>obviously). 
>> 
>> Any ideas? Maybe I am missing some configuration, but I could not
>>figure out from the release notes if I needed to do something extra.
>
>No, this is probably a regression on my part.  I thought I had added
>tests with the int64in/out record types, but apparently I have not (yet).
>
>> This is on Mac OSX El Capitan, 10.11.6. I can try other platforms later
>>but at the first sight this does not appear to be a platform-specific
>>issue.
>> 
>> Timo
>> 
>

Attachment: Makefile
Description: Makefile

Attachment: st.cmd
Description: st.cmd


Replies:
Re: 64-bit records Shen, Guobao via Core-talk
References:
64-bit records Timo Korhonen via Core-talk
Re: 64-bit records Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Warning when building areaDetector with base 7.0.2 Mark Rivers via Core-talk
Next: Re: 64-bit records Shen, Guobao via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: 64-bit records Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
Next: Re: 64-bit records Shen, Guobao via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 09 Jan 2019 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·