Recently activated new rules in our ITER software QA system have me go through EPICS modules once again, trying to make them pass quality gates.
Is it worth fixing smallish things in the yacc sources inside libCom, or should I just tag them as 'won't fix' in our static analysis application? I'm happy to provide pull requests, but only if they have a chance to be approved.
Cheers, ~Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Build failed: epics-base base-epicsThreadShow-zombies-962 AppVeyor via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Build failed: epics-base base-epicsThreadShow-zombies-962 AppVeyor via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
|