Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System
|
On 5/25/23 10:42 AM, Ralph Lange via Core-talk wrote:
Recently activated new rules in our ITER software
QA system have me go through EPICS modules once again, trying to
make them pass quality gates.
Is it worth fixing smallish things in the yacc sources
inside libCom, or should I just tag them as 'won't fix' in our
static analysis application?
I'm happy to provide pull requests, but only if they have a
chance to be approved.
My main concern now with changing the flex and antelope sources is
that we don't have comprehensive unit tests that could detect
changes that subtly affect their functionality. The things that the
QA tools want should be acceptable as long as they stay small and
localized.
- Andrew
--
Complexity comes for free, Simplicity you have to work for.
|
- References:
- Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Ralph Lange via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Next:
Build failed: EPICS Base 7 base-7.0-933 AppVeyor via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?! Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Next:
Build failed: EPICS Base 7 base-7.0-933 AppVeyor via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
|
|
ANJ, 26 May 2023 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|
