Re: Fixes for yacc code in Base?!

[Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

On 5/25/23 08:42, Ralph Lange via Core-talk wrote:
> Recently activated new rules in our ITER software QA system have me go through EPICS modules once again, trying to make them pass quality gates.
>
> Is it worth fixing smallish things in the yacc sources inside libCom, or should I just tag them as 'won't fix' in our static analysis application?
> I'm happy to provide pull requests, but only if they have a chance to be approved.
In the past I know that I have pushed against spending time on this
antique code.  On the other hand, the most recent change to yacc/
was me quieting a UBSan warning.  Which I suspect is the kind of
issue your QA tools will flag.  So I guess I can't honestly object
to your making similar "non-functional" changes.