EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks?
From: "Ford, Christopher" <[email protected]>
To: Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:56:44 +0000
Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]> writes:
> Which kind of device are you using ?

I am adding support for an incremental counter from ADDI-DATA, using asynPortDriver.

Thanks for the feedack!
 -Chris Ford, SLAC
________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks?

To my knowledge,
there is no update.
In our driver, we do it like this:

     /* If not moving, trigger a record processing at low rate */
     if (!nowMoving) setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_, newPositionInSteps + 1);
     setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_, newPositionInSteps);

And I added a test case:
https://github.com/EuropeanSpallationSource/MCAG_Base_Project/blob/master/epics/test/500_DLY-STOP.py

Out of curiosity:
Which kind of device are you using ?


On 25/05/16 23:50, Ford, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 2015 there was some discussion on Tech-Talk about how to force a callback for a parameter that had not changed values.
> Mark Rivers suggested a work-around, as shown below.
> I wonder if anyone has an update on the situation since then?  Has any other method appeared?  Or did you have success with the work-around?
>
> Thanks,
>  -Chris Ford, SLAC
>
> On16 Nov 2015 Mark Rivers writes:
>> If a driver wants to force a callback there is a method that does not require any changes to the base classes, e.g. exposing statusChanged_ as protected or adding a new
>> isMotorRecordnowFilterButAlwaysProcess_ flag.  The driver simply needs to set a parameter to a different value from present and then back to its current value, for example
>>  setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position+1.);
>>  setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position);
>>  callParamCallbacks();
>


References:
Area Detector question Jörn Wüstenfeld
RE: Area Detector question ulrik.pedersen
RE: Area Detector question Mark Rivers
asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Ford, Christopher
Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Torsten Bögershausen

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: archiver appliance vs. data browser michael.kenning
Next: RE: archiver appliance vs. data browser Schmeißer, Martin
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Henrique Almeida
Next: Re: Area Detector question bob dalesio
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 15 Jul 2016 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·