EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable
From: Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: Andrew Johnson <anj at anl.gov>
Cc: "Barrett \(US\), Patrick E" <patrick.e.barrett at boeing.com>, "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:22:39 -0800
On 1/6/23 09:24, Andrew Johnson via Tech-talk wrote:
epicsThreadSleepQuantum

	

This function returns the minimum slumber interval obtainable with epicsThreadSleep() in seconds. On most OS there is a system scheduler interrupt interval which determines the value of this parameter. Knowledge of this parameter is used by the various components of EPICS to improve scheduling of software tasks in time when the reduction of average time scheduling errors is important. If this parameter is unknown or is unpredictable for a particular OS then it is safe to return zero.

I obviously forgot that last sentence when I wrote the code in dbScan.c which divides by the quantum, so that should get fixed although nobody has actually reported being hit by it in over 10 years.

To my mind, we should drop this last sentence.  There are simply too many places where
"epicsThreadSleep(epicsThreadSleepQuantum())" is called.  eg. epicsThreadOnce()
in posix/osdThread.c


References:
Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Barrett (US), Patrick E via Tech-talk
Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Érico Nogueira Rolim via Tech-talk
Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Ricardo Cardenes via Tech-talk
Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Andrew Johnson via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Scan rate '.01 second' not achievable Hu, Yong via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
ANJ, 09 Jan 2023 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·