EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules)
From: Kate Feng <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Johnson <[email protected]>, EPICS tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:38:38 -0500
Kate Feng wrote:

> I agree with you  that one should enable the posted write by default.
> However, it could be disabled, which means the address
> pipelining on the  UniverseII could be disabled as well on the Mvme5500.
> I thought the origianl issue is "to disable the  address pipelinig".
> It  looks like you have a reason to disable the posted write
> for the NI VME-MXI-1.   The trad off is to sacrifice the bandwidth
> of the VME bus.  However, I do not know if  the decrease is
> significant for your application.   I hope this helps.
>

I  ran a   short test, which  showed  a decrease of  33% in
performance for the posted-write disabled mode.  It might not be worse
than the VMEchip2 that was used on the MVME167, which is in
your existing system.   I do not have  the datasheet for the
VMEchip2.  I guess it does not provide address pipeling,
which explained why it worked fine with the  MXI-1.


Again,  hoping this helps.   -- Kate



Replies:
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules) Eric Bjorklund
References:
mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modern VME CPU modules) Kate Feng
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modern VME CPU modules) Andrew Johnson
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVME CPU modules) Kate Feng
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVME CPU modules) Andrew Johnson
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPU modules) Kate Feng
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPU modules) Andrew Johnson
Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules) Kate Feng

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules) Kate Feng
Next: Job opening at APS John Maclean
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules) Kate Feng
Next: Re: mvme5500 (was National Instruments VME-MXI-1 modules vs. modernVMECPUmodules) Eric Bjorklund
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  <20042005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·