EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: RT linux
From: John Sinclair <[email protected]>
To: Tech-talk <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:12:46 -0400
Emanuel,

One could imagine many systems with requirements which the use of a real-time kernel could satisfy.
For example, suppose you needed to talk to some synchronous serial device
that required the generation of output signals at precise intervals of precise duration and so forth.
If the device could tolerate +/- 50 us in the duration of this signal, then you would need to
be sure you could change its state with the same time precision. You could do this easily
with an FPGA or some other dedicated piece of hardware, but +/- 50 us is also in the range of a
software solution running under VxWorks or RTEMS or even some RTlinux. Running the software
on a non-realtime kernel would probably work most of the time but not all of the time. Doing the
same using posix realtime scheduling would be better, but it would still be possible for a piece of driver
code to cause problems so a realtime kernel (preemptive kernel using realtime scheduling alone) would
be the only reliable software solution (assuming we are excluding a hard-realtime solution).


John Sinclair

Emmanuel Mayssat wrote:
Hello,

I was wondering what would justify moving to RT linux?
I was actually contemplating doing the move to RT myself, but finally
decided against it.

All RT-required feedback/acquisition/etc are implemented in
hardware/electronics. As a result, my IOCs don't have to react
Real-Time.

But could you describe a "real" situation where RT is necessary? Maybe if you have an IOC which is connected to a device that generate
hardware interrupts, etc. but so far I never encountered such a device.


Thanks,

--
E

On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 05:59 -0500, David Kline wrote:
you can use >=2.6.18 linux kernel/w patch from osadl (http://www.osadl.org/). that will give you rt behavior.
/david


Heinrich du Toit wrote:
Hi

Did somebody else out there use RTLinux for EPICS?

-Heinrich





References:
RT linux Heinrich du Toit
Re: RT linux David Kline
Re: RT linux Emmanuel Mayssat

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: RT linux David Kline
Next: asyn for synchronous devices Emmanuel Mayssat
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: RT linux David Kline
Next: Re: RT linux Heinrich du Toit
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  <20072008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Nov 2011 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·